SwiftLabs Solutions

Use case

Document search

In every company that has grown over time, the knowledge sits in folders only two people know. The bottleneck is not searching - it is that nobody searches and asks a colleague instead.

Usually the process accepted fastest

The difference

The same process, once as it is today and once with us.

  1. 01Question
  2. 02Search
  3. 03Answer

A person does itThe system does it

How it runs today

  1. 01Records sit on network drives, in the mail archive and in filing structures that grew rather than were designed.
  2. 02Whoever needs something asks the colleague who worked on it last.
  3. 03If she is on holiday, what already exists gets worked out again.

How it would run with us

  1. 01The question goes to the records, not to the colleague who last dealt with them.
  2. 02The search covers network drive, mail archive and DMS at once - permissions stay exactly as they are.
  3. 03The answer names the document, the passage and the revision.

What it gets you

  • An answer no longer depends on who last touched the case.
  • The search runs across every store at once, with the permissions that already apply.
  • The answer names its source - you can check it instead of trusting it.

Where it does not fit

If the records contradict each other, the search makes that visible - it cannot resolve it. Sometimes that is the actual finding.

Frequently asked

How long does implementation take?

3 to 5 weeks, depending on the state of the filing. Building it is usually the shorter half - the time goes into access, coordination and test cases.

What do we have to provide?

Read access to the archives that are to be searched - network drive, mail archive, DMS. A permissions rule: who may see which records. The system adopts it, it does not work around it. A dozen typical everyday questions as touchstones. Nothing more is needed to start.

How will we know it works?

From verifiable criteria agreed before the build: On 50 prepared questions, at least 85 % come back with an answer and a correct source. Every answer names the document it came from - no source, no answer. Nobody sees records through the search that they could not open directly.

Does the AI decide on its own?

Pure enquiry runs independently, because it changes nothing. Anything that creates or sends a document is a different process.

When is this not worth it?

If the records contradict each other, the search makes that visible - it cannot resolve it. Sometimes that is the actual finding.

Which sectors does this suit?

In our experience particularly Mechanical engineering, Industrial suppliers, Law firms. The process itself is sector-independent, though - what matters is whether it repeats.

Let us start with a conversation.

You tell us where your time goes. We put it in writing: what is worth automating, and roughly what that costs.

ContactTry the process check first - two minutes